Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Nina Stojanovic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Stojanovic analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Nina Stojanovic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 1 - 0 Stojanovic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 47.19% of points on their second serve, while Stojanovic has won 53.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 55.59% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stojanovic has won 59.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.7% and 46.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 65.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stojanovic has saved 64.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 50% of matches played (W/L 12/ 12), with Stojanovic winning 87.5% (W/L 7/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12). Stojanovic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 139/ 83), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Stojanovic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 87.5% of matches (W/L 7/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gibert winning 1 times and Stojanovic being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gibert winning 2 and Stojanovic winning 1. The last match between Gibert and Stojanovic was at the Valencia, 28-09-2018, Quarterfinals, Clay with Paula Badosa Gibert getting the victory 6-4 6-7(11) 7-6(7).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:51:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gibert and Stojanovic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gibert winning 1 times and Stojanovic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Gibert winning 1, and Stojanovic 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.5 while Stojanovic has played against players with an average rank of 228.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stojanovic has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 44.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stojanovic has converted 53.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
118
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
688
Rank
81
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
64% (347-196)
Career Total W/L
60% (252-169)
50% (11-11)
YTD W/L
88% (7-1)
$5,050,999
Career Prize Money
$296,133
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gibert VS Stojanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Nina Stojanovic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:51:0 | 2:51:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (69/120) | 60% (70/117) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (52/69) | 67% (47/70) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (22/51) | 43% (20/47) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (50/117) | 38% (46/120) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gibert VS Stojanovic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-7(11) 7-6(7) |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Nina Stojanovic
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
60%
(
70 of
117)
5
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
8
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
46 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
50 of
117)
124
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Nina Stojanovic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (11/11) | 88% (7/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 78% (14/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (254/249) | 61% (100/63) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 88% (7/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.33 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 111 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 217.41 | 228.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1021/1716) | 58% (254/435) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (666/1021) | 63% (161/254) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (328/695) | 53% (96/181) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (81/181) | 54% (35/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (684/1623) | 52% (234/453) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 88% (7/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 88% (7/8) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 58% (7/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 56% (9/5) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 44% (9/4) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 50% (2/1) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Mirra Andreeva
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
93)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
49%
(
41 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
66%
(
70 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
90)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(4) 4-6 3-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
51%
(
44 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
4
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nina Stojanovic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Vivian Wolff
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
38 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Ksenia Laskutova
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
67 of
101)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
50 of
101)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
25 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Ioana Zvonaru
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Natalija Senic
Player
Nina Stojanovic
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-6(4) 6-7(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Melisa Ercan
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shuai Zhang
Player
Nina Stojanovic
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nina Stojanovic
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
68%
(
80 of
117)
1st Serve %
78%
(
80 of
103)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
43 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
113
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(10) 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Stojanovic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibert are available here and Stojanovic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
